Ooooooh, the possibilities
<mad_scientist>
So, seeing that now protonium is not only verified, but producible in non-trivial amounts, and given that protonium atoms are bosons of zero charge...
Protonium Bose-Einstein condensate, anyone? Might be an interesting way to keep the matter/anti-matter from annihilating, at macroscopic quantities, by keeping it in a single superpositional state.
Oops, I just invented the antimatter bomb. So sorry.
</mad_scientist>
So, seeing that now protonium is not only verified, but producible in non-trivial amounts, and given that protonium atoms are bosons of zero charge...
Protonium Bose-Einstein condensate, anyone? Might be an interesting way to keep the matter/anti-matter from annihilating, at macroscopic quantities, by keeping it in a single superpositional state.
Oops, I just invented the antimatter bomb. So sorry.
</mad_scientist>
no subject
:D
no subject
no subject
That's what happend to this friend of mine, but he had a lobotomy and now he's all better.
no subject
(IAsoNAL, but I've had to research patent law recently).
no subject
no subject
no subject
This rule was implemented in 37 CFR 1.91:
(a) A model or exhibit will not be admitted as part of the record of an application unless it:
(1) Substantially conforms to the requirements of § 1.52 or § 1.84;
(2) Is specifically required by the Office; or
(3) Is filed with a petition under this section including:
(i) The fee set forth in § 1.17(h); and
(ii) An explanation of why entry of the model or exhibit in the file record is necessary to demonstrate patentability.
no subject
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#whatpat
no subject
no subject
no subject
You rock.
no subject
Bippy + antimatter bombs = BAAAAAAD.
I said I was a *mad* scientist, not an *insane* scientist.