kickaha: (ahhhhh)
[personal profile] kickaha
<mad_scientist>
So, seeing that now protonium is not only verified, but producible in non-trivial amounts, and given that protonium atoms are bosons of zero charge...

Protonium Bose-Einstein condensate, anyone? Might be an interesting way to keep the matter/anti-matter from annihilating, at macroscopic quantities, by keeping it in a single superpositional state.

Oops, I just invented the antimatter bomb. So sorry.
</mad_scientist>

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-15 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ginkgo.livejournal.com
Maybe I shouldn't be leaving you alone for a week...

:D

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-15 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kickaha.livejournal.com
Good thing this is the week I start at the site *without* the nifty physics labs, eh? :D

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-15 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jason0x21.livejournal.com
It's so immoral, just working on it's enough to drive you insane.

That's what happend to this friend of mine, but he had a lobotomy and now he's all better.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-15 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badger.livejournal.com
Now that you've stated the concept in public, I believe you have one year to file a patent.
(IAsoNAL, but I've had to research patent law recently).

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-16 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimokeane.livejournal.com
The statement of the concept needs to be "enabling," as in, has to give away how he does it, to trigger that year-long grace period, which only applies in the USA. In all other countries of the world, you cannot apply for a patent after having made an enabling public disclosure.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-16 01:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] georgmi.livejournal.com
Unfortunately, you need a working device in order to get a patent.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-16 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimokeane.livejournal.com
Not true for a long time - see 35 USC 114 "Models, specimens" including "The Director may require the applicant to furnish a model of convenient size to exhibit advantageously the several parts of his invention."

This rule was implemented in 37 CFR 1.91:
(a) A model or exhibit will not be admitted as part of the record of an application unless it:

(1) Substantially conforms to the requirements of § 1.52 or § 1.84;

(2) Is specifically required by the Office; or

(3) Is filed with a petition under this section including:

(i) The fee set forth in § 1.17(h); and

(ii) An explanation of why entry of the model or exhibit in the file record is necessary to demonstrate patentability.


(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-16 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] georgmi.livejournal.com
And _that_ is what I get for reading the FAQs on the Patent Office Web site instead of doing real research.

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#whatpat

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-18 02:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ginkgo.livejournal.com
CELL BATTERY DIED STOP AMAZED I REMEMBERED PASSWORD STOP WILL CALL TOMORROW STOP LOVE STOP

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-18 02:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kickaha.livejournal.com
LOL OMG, you rock. :D

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-18 07:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madpiratebippy.livejournal.com
See, and here we talked about sex and food today. Dammit. We should have been talking about building antimatter bombs.

You rock.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-18 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kickaha.livejournal.com
NONONONONONONO!

Bippy + antimatter bombs = BAAAAAAD.

I said I was a *mad* scientist, not an *insane* scientist.

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags