Ooooooh, the possibilities
<mad_scientist>
So, seeing that now protonium is not only verified, but producible in non-trivial amounts, and given that protonium atoms are bosons of zero charge...
Protonium Bose-Einstein condensate, anyone? Might be an interesting way to keep the matter/anti-matter from annihilating, at macroscopic quantities, by keeping it in a single superpositional state.
Oops, I just invented the antimatter bomb. So sorry.
</mad_scientist>
So, seeing that now protonium is not only verified, but producible in non-trivial amounts, and given that protonium atoms are bosons of zero charge...
Protonium Bose-Einstein condensate, anyone? Might be an interesting way to keep the matter/anti-matter from annihilating, at macroscopic quantities, by keeping it in a single superpositional state.
Oops, I just invented the antimatter bomb. So sorry.
</mad_scientist>
no subject
:D
no subject
no subject
That's what happend to this friend of mine, but he had a lobotomy and now he's all better.
no subject
(IAsoNAL, but I've had to research patent law recently).
no subject
no subject
This rule was implemented in 37 CFR 1.91:
(a) A model or exhibit will not be admitted as part of the record of an application unless it:
(1) Substantially conforms to the requirements of § 1.52 or § 1.84;
(2) Is specifically required by the Office; or
(3) Is filed with a petition under this section including:
(i) The fee set forth in § 1.17(h); and
(ii) An explanation of why entry of the model or exhibit in the file record is necessary to demonstrate patentability.
no subject
no subject
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#whatpat
no subject
no subject
no subject
You rock.
no subject
Bippy + antimatter bombs = BAAAAAAD.
I said I was a *mad* scientist, not an *insane* scientist.