Troublesome.
It's not that my current project to graduate is driving me insane.
It's not that it'll be a steaming pile of poo by the time I'm done with it, but (barely) functional.
It's not even that I chose perhaps the hardest possible route I could have to get done.
It's that in a few weeks when gcc4.0 comes out, all this work will have been wasted.
*whimper*
It's not that it'll be a steaming pile of poo by the time I'm done with it, but (barely) functional.
It's not even that I chose perhaps the hardest possible route I could have to get done.
It's that in a few weeks when gcc4.0 comes out, all this work will have been wasted.
*whimper*
no subject
no subject
gcc4 will have a radically changed internal representation. I'll be damned lucky if it looks anything like what I've spent the last year working on.
no subject
no subject
And whoever heard of using a record_type node to store a function pointer?? Insanity, I tell you.
NOT IMPORTANT
DO NOT worry about this, or spend one minute even figuring out what gcc4 is going to offer - you don't have time! Take it from A Man Who Knows - you need to duck your head down and steam ahead, damn the torpedoes, slings and arrows.
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
Yup, should have gone the parser route. *sigh*
no subject
no subject