Troublesome.
It's not that my current project to graduate is driving me insane.
It's not that it'll be a steaming pile of poo by the time I'm done with it, but (barely) functional.
It's not even that I chose perhaps the hardest possible route I could have to get done.
It's that in a few weeks when gcc4.0 comes out, all this work will have been wasted.
*whimper*
It's not that it'll be a steaming pile of poo by the time I'm done with it, but (barely) functional.
It's not even that I chose perhaps the hardest possible route I could have to get done.
It's that in a few weeks when gcc4.0 comes out, all this work will have been wasted.
*whimper*
no subject
no subject
gcc4 will have a radically changed internal representation. I'll be damned lucky if it looks anything like what I've spent the last year working on.
NOT IMPORTANT
DO NOT worry about this, or spend one minute even figuring out what gcc4 is going to offer - you don't have time! Take it from A Man Who Knows - you need to duck your head down and steam ahead, damn the torpedoes, slings and arrows.
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
no subject
no subject
And whoever heard of using a record_type node to store a function pointer?? Insanity, I tell you.
no subject
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
Re: NOT IMPORTANT
Yup, should have gone the parser route. *sigh*
no subject