No, it's just screwed up. Passing a function pointer is one thing, but to declare the type in the argument list is just sadistic.
I swear to god, these people have never heard of typedefs.
OTOH, adapting the code to analyze this, plus this little gem (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-August/002670.html) got me thinking, and voila: I now can support closures/blocks/lambdas/inner methods.
no subject
Sounds like a poor mans screwed up visitor...
no subject
I swear to god, these people have never heard of typedefs.
OTOH, adapting the code to analyze this, plus this little gem (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-August/002670.html) got me thinking, and voila: I now can support closures/blocks/lambdas/inner methods.
:)
no subject
no subject
no subject
;)
no subject
no subject
I want to be the random pot calling the kettle a geek.
Or something. ;)