No, it's just screwed up. Passing a function pointer is one thing, but to declare the type in the argument list is just sadistic.
I swear to god, these people have never heard of typedefs.
OTOH, adapting the code to analyze this, plus this little gem (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-August/002670.html) got me thinking, and voila: I now can support closures/blocks/lambdas/inner methods.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kickaha![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 05:30 pm (UTC)Sounds like a poor mans screwed up visitor...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 06:01 pm (UTC)I swear to god, these people have never heard of typedefs.
OTOH, adapting the code to analyze this, plus this little gem (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-August/002670.html) got me thinking, and voila: I now can support closures/blocks/lambdas/inner methods.
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-02 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 12:11 am (UTC);)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 12:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-03 12:43 am (UTC)I want to be the random pot calling the kettle a geek.
Or something. ;)