kickaha: (Default)
[personal profile] kickaha
GET IT IN FUCKING WRITING!!!

Although it sounds like in this case it wouldn't have mattered anyway, with this judge.

Jesus, some people are so fricking dense.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/23/sperm.donor.ap/index.html

Re: Yeah, that judge...

Date: 2004-07-27 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flinx.livejournal.com
Bugger. So the judge takes a bad and spurious complaint and makes it that much worse. It's almost as if he's personally speaking out against the entire concept of sperm donation, the culture of voluntary single parenthood, and what all those entail. Sheeit. Not the place of a judge to make those kind of pronouncements. (which is why sometimes I think me, Scalia, a 2x4 and a dark alley would be a beautiful thing...)

Re: Yeah, that judge...

Date: 2004-07-28 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ginkgo.livejournal.com
I *so* completely agree with you - except for the dark alley bit. :) The implications of this ruling really scare me. Here's hoping that he will appeal and that Supreme Court will find a reason to overturn the Superior Court's ruling. :P

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags