And now the other shoe...
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So what exactly was the change in fundamental direction that made the just-passed bailout plan better?
There, that should work...
Graft, plain and simple. "Vote for this, and we'll make one of your donating constituents happy!"
Lovely.
There, that should work...
Graft, plain and simple. "Vote for this, and we'll make one of your donating constituents happy!"
Lovely.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 06:36 pm (UTC)(Though the last time somebody sent me a CNN link, it was also bogus; CNN seems to take down their stories as fast as they put them up.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 06:43 pm (UTC)Mmm, pork and small potatoes. I'm hungry.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 07:38 pm (UTC)1) No politician will be allowed to accept a donation from a corporation.
2) No politician will be allowed to accept a donation from a citizen who is not a direct part of their home constituency.
3) No bill, rider, or line item will be allowed if it benefits solely citizens from a single state.
Boom. Narrows the focus of the elected officials to the *people* they are supposed to represent. Forces them to spend more time working for inter-state benefits... because let's face it, if they're there at the *federal* level looking for *local* funding, something is wrong.
I'd also eliminate lobbying completely. Corporations can go hang, for all I care.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 08:21 pm (UTC)Viva la revolución.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 09:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 11:41 pm (UTC)1) No politician will be allowed to accept a donation from any person or entity who is not a living biological citizen.
I would also *strongly* recommend a 'single topic bill' amendment such as many states have forbidding a bill to pertain to more than a single topic.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-04 12:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-04 01:06 am (UTC)The "single topic bill" idea is a good one, to my mind... Which is why it'd never even get introduced, much less passed.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-04 01:20 am (UTC)*People* have 1st Amendment rights. Corporations only have them through the fiction of "personhood". Get rid of that, and there's absolutely no reason that I see why a corporation, as in a lobbying firm, can't be blocked from access to Congress. Individual lobbyists would have to be solo operatives in such an environment, greatly reducing their effectiveness.
If *people* want to talk to Congress, great. I wish they would more often.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-04 05:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-04 08:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 08:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 08:21 pm (UTC)Yeah, if this was the alternative
Date: 2008-10-03 11:52 pm (UTC)It's scary, I agree largely with Paul Krugman on this one. Sure sign of the apocalypse there.
Re: Yeah, if this was the alternative
Date: 2008-10-04 12:36 am (UTC)And then there's the Twinkie...