kickaha: (Default)
[personal profile] kickaha
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/292378_timeguy15.html

Now that's elegant science. Create one pair of entangled photons, send #1 immediately to a particle/wave detector, send #2 through a 50ms delay to a second detector that can force the state to be particle or wave, and see if you can also force #1 to be one or the other... 50ms before you alter its twin.

Elegant. Simple. Outstanding.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-16 04:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kickaha.livejournal.com
Shhhh, you'll scare the laypeople.

Yeah, I noticed that too - I suspect there was a detail that the interviewer missed in translation. Still, assume that the detector is for something as 'simple' as spin up/down, and you can alter Brain into one or the other. If you can demonstrate that you can control Pinky via Brain, then... well, it'd be neat. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-16 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] actsofcreation.livejournal.com
Surely naming photons after beloved cartoon characters mitigated the 'scare the laypeople' effect :)

Being photons, spin is clearly out... one might in principle use polarization...

Frankly though, controlling Pinky via Brain would be kind of scary... causality makes the trains run on time...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-16 05:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kickaha.livejournal.com
LOL You're right, spin was was a bad example. :) (Gawd, it's been a while.)

And I think it'd be a *beautiful* thing if it were proven that retrocausality existed... and then we could find absolutely no practical use for it. My inner physicist would siiiiiiiiiiing...

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags