Oh this is going to cause much whining...
Jul. 22nd, 2006 04:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kickahahttp://www.startrek.com/custom/include/series/MOV/011/poster1/800x1035.jpg
New Star Trek movie, due in 2008. J.J. Abrams (Felicity, Alias, Lost) writing and directing.
Note distinct retro look.
I smell TOS reboot.
Cool.
New Star Trek movie, due in 2008. J.J. Abrams (Felicity, Alias, Lost) writing and directing.
Note distinct retro look.
I smell TOS reboot.
Cool.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-22 09:15 pm (UTC)That's kind of TOS time period, little before.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-22 09:33 pm (UTC)1) ST: Academy. How Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty, et al met up
2) ST: The Continuing Voyages. The rest of the five-year mission.
3) ST: Aw fuck it, let's just do it over. Complete reboot.
All three would be the KSB trio, with new actors.
Personally I'd love to see the time period between Eprise and TOS covered, but B&B managed to screw up continuity already so badly with Eprise, and then it was cancelled just as they brought on decent writers and it was getting interesting. Bleah.
not to disappoint...
Date: 2006-07-22 09:24 pm (UTC);-)
Re: not to disappoint...
Date: 2006-07-22 09:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-23 12:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-24 03:49 pm (UTC)Does that mean we get Jennifer Garner as Yeoman Rand?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-24 06:22 pm (UTC)This sounds scarily A) workable and B) like fanfic.
BLEACH. I NEED BLEACH.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-24 06:59 pm (UTC)Ew.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-24 09:07 pm (UTC)AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-23 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-24 03:48 pm (UTC)