*Other* than the technical aspects, it is extremely well done, and has some interesting insights. It's a good solid mess o' data, I just had an issue with how it was grouped. Wallace didn't do anything wrong, per se, she just didn't have the background to identify which elements had hidden technical components.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Citation
Date: 2005-03-31 03:26 pm (UTC)*Other* than the technical aspects, it is extremely well done, and has some interesting insights. It's a good solid mess o' data, I just had an issue with how it was grouped. Wallace didn't do anything wrong, per se, she just didn't have the background to identify which elements had hidden technical components.