I'm utterly confused.
Since when does the federal legislative branch have the right to:
a) break the Constitution wrt to state's rights and intervene in an internal state matter with a federal court;
b) override a state judicial branch single-handedly, before a federal court review, and use executive powers of law enforcement to have their way;
Did I miss a few new Amendments that give Congress total authority?
a) break the Constitution wrt to state's rights and intervene in an internal state matter with a federal court;
b) override a state judicial branch single-handedly, before a federal court review, and use executive powers of law enforcement to have their way;
Did I miss a few new Amendments that give Congress total authority?

no subject
Sorry for the sarcastic response, but I don't really have a logical one. I assumed you were talking about the latest media diversion in the form of Terri Schiavo. I could say what I think the GOP's purpose is in getting involved, but then I'd just get bitter and cynical and ranty, and no one wants to see that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Thank you FDR
Has the bill been published yet?
There are only a few ways I can think of for them to even pretend to justify this:
Any of these would of course add to the very long list of powers Congress claims without the states ever having delegated them.
At least there's nowhere higher for this issue to go. If Congress doesn't manage to interfere, that should be it.
Re: Has the bill been published yet?
Re: Has the bill been published yet?
Re: Has the bill been published yet?
no subject
no subject