(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-14 06:32 am (UTC)
Oh I hear ya. Definitely, this is the most clear-cut example I've ever had of this - the entire approach is changing, such that it is going to end up looking *NOTHING* like what it started out as. I've never had that happen before.

Basically, I architected a dandy tool for divining what the &*(@# was going on with gcc, but that tool doesn't work at all for what I actually need to *do* with it. I'm shocked I'm being able to save as much code as I have been able to. (Whoo Visitor pattern!)

Now if I could just get the memory requirements under half a gig... (one thread, massive data amounts running around in a garbage collected environment, all interconnected like spaghetti - you try finding the zero ref objects. :P) I cut it by about 10% last night, am hoping to squeeze another 25-30% out by the time I'm done.

Careful you don't fall prey to the Second System Syndrome though... Brooks nailed it with that one. :) (The tendency for developers of any stripe to say, after shipping the first product "Aha! I know how to do it *right* this time!" and then they get all excited, and end up throwing in everything including the kitchen sink, and screwing it up massively by losing focus.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags