ext_11653 ([identity profile] flinx.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kickaha 2004-11-02 06:17 pm (UTC)

At a national and state level? Hell, no. I went with those least undesirable who actually had chances of winning. Because that means that the most undesirable don't win.

At a local level (county and city), yes. Hoping that as the parties get more recognition at a local level, they'll be able to increase their visibility and memorability.

On the other hand, I voted. So I get to bitch about the results, no matter what happens.

I admit to playing the two-party game, although I wholly agree with your arguments for ranked voting, and a few other points you've brought up.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting