Re: Yeah, that judge...

Date: 2004-07-27 04:33 am (UTC)
That's because the article sucks.

She didn't even file for support until the kids were five. I think she'd budgeted for being a single mother of one, not two.

Despite that misleading "no evidence of an agreement" quote from the mother's lawyer, the judges most assuredly did find evidence of an agreement and in fact in the official write up the mother's action are referred to as "despicable."

The thing is, by holding *these* children "most dear" we are cheating the unmentioned two toddlers the man has had with his WIFE in the five flippin' years that passed before bitch filed.

Sorry. This is hitting way too close to home. Those twins are costing the man more than what I make in a month when I can find work... What had Mr. and Mrs. McKiernan planned on providing their own children that is $12,000K a year gone now-- college savings? music lessons? flights out to see their grandparents?

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags