(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-08 03:21 am (UTC)
While I fully agree that Kerry/Edwards is a sub-optimal choice, this election isn't about optimal choices.

I'm fully in support of voting reform, (http://www.livejournal.com/users/georgedorn/103418.html?nc=6) I even voted for Nader in 2000 (I was in a safely Democratic state) but voting for a third party this election isn't the way to make it happen.

Voting for a third party in the upcoming election to send a message that you want voting reform is a bit like refusing the help of an attorney when you're on trial for you life, on the grounds that you have a beef with the way the court system operates. The court (i.e. reality) doesn't give a rat's ass about your principles, you're just going to get fried.

Want election reform? Start locally. If there's still time to get a referendum on the November ballots, now's a good time to start. The more people see run-off voting in statewide elections for lower offices, the more open to reform everyone will be.

Yet another reason to vote for Kerry: in 2000, Gore won the popular vote. Big deal, it was by a pretty narrow margin anyway. This year, Bush could still win while Kerry also wins the popular vote. If the popular vote margin is even bigger, such as, say 10% of the vote, there's going to be a whole lot more talk about voting reform. So even if you're in a solidly Democratic state, it's still pretty damn important to vote that way.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kickaha: (Default)
kickaha

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags