Jun. 14th, 2006
Hear ye, hear ye....
Jun. 14th, 2006 03:30 pmIn the interest of making the PC more, well, PC, the following has been enacted:
1) Profiling is evil. Stop it.
2) Methods that perform under expectations are no longer allowed to be called 'slow'. The proper term is 'differently timed'.
3) Under the American Methods with Disabilities Act, such methods *must* be accommodated to perform at their full potential.
So the next time you need to buy faster hardware, tell your manager it's required by law. I'm sure they'll understand.
1) Profiling is evil. Stop it.
2) Methods that perform under expectations are no longer allowed to be called 'slow'. The proper term is 'differently timed'.
3) Under the American Methods with Disabilities Act, such methods *must* be accommodated to perform at their full potential.
So the next time you need to buy faster hardware, tell your manager it's required by law. I'm sure they'll understand.
Hear ye, hear ye....
Jun. 14th, 2006 03:30 pmIn the interest of making the PC more, well, PC, the following has been enacted:
1) Profiling is evil. Stop it.
2) Methods that perform under expectations are no longer allowed to be called 'slow'. The proper term is 'differently timed'.
3) Under the American Methods with Disabilities Act, such methods *must* be accommodated to perform at their full potential.
So the next time you need to buy faster hardware, tell your manager it's required by law. I'm sure they'll understand.
1) Profiling is evil. Stop it.
2) Methods that perform under expectations are no longer allowed to be called 'slow'. The proper term is 'differently timed'.
3) Under the American Methods with Disabilities Act, such methods *must* be accommodated to perform at their full potential.
So the next time you need to buy faster hardware, tell your manager it's required by law. I'm sure they'll understand.