I can see that. "Potential companion A is x% likely to put out, PC B y% likely, and PC C z% likely. Therefore, if I ask all three out at once, I am (1-((1-x)*(1-y)*(1-z)))% likely to get laid, and (1-((1-x)*(1-y)*(1-z))) is obviously a much higher number than x, y, or z individually, with the added bonus of a certain percentage chance of a threesome-or-better."
I totally don't see why that didn't work out for him.
If only it had been about sex, he might have succeeded. These were girls he legitimately wanted to go out on dates with, as we heard it. He figured he didn't have time to go out with each one individually, so the last one standing at the end of the night (the one who would "get" him and his plan) would be the girl for him.
Ah. Really best to set people's expectations correctly if you desire an optimal outcome. But hey, speed dating, before it became popular! A man ahead of his time.
Though I encountered a quote last week which resonated with me: "An artist is never ahead of his time, but most people are far behind theirs." (Edgar Varese).
Re: lol
I totally don't see why that didn't work out for him.
Re: lol
Re: lol
Though I encountered a quote last week which resonated with me: "An artist is never ahead of his time, but most people are far behind theirs." (Edgar Varese).