ginkgo and I have an ongoing game we like to call "Fake or Real?" which is exactly what you think it is.
Las Vegas offered an interesting variation. "Fake, Real, or Passing?" I know the Fakes outnumbered the Reals about 8:1, but the Passings may have also outnumbered the Reals in this case. Amazing.
Yeah, ginkgo has corrupted me. I didn't used to be a gawker (I mean, I *looked*, but I didn't *gawk*), but now? I'm so going to get my ass kicked some day. "I was looking at them for my wife! I *SWEAR*!"
Moving away from NC intensified my preference for the real. Fake is the norm up here as well - in faces as well as bewbs. Restalyne, silicone, Botox, nothing beats the movement and *aging* of real bodies for me. I want to see someone smile and know that they have smiled during their life.
Yeah, while I am *all* about the cleavage, up here the views tend to be a bit... rigid. There's no *bounce*. And you are so dead right about the faces up here - if they're not scowling, they're locked into a deathmask. :P
I use it as an "on the bubble" category. One woman in an "athletic profession" was "passing" until she did a pirouette and her chest spun in two different manners. :D
Frankly, I'm not so sure. Some boob jobs are so screamingly obvious immediately that it's hard to take their owner seriously, no matter how good the surgeon. I have seen a few which I was later informed were deliberately under-inflated so as to leave a more natural feel, in addition to the enhanced look. It depends on to what extremes one wants to go...
True, true... body mods in general are a broad spectrum. I suppose there are folks who go for the Z0MGFAK3!11 look deliberately for the added discrepancy value.
So wait - under-inflated looks more fake? Huh. I would have expected them to look better.
Err, 'enhanced look' as in 'definitely larger than before'. I certainly couldn't tell the difference from where I stood in those cases. I wasn't allowed to do quality-control testing. Strictly for research, you understand. My offers were merely smiled at. *sigh*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-21 11:50 pm (UTC)Clearly, I need to hang out with you guys more. :p
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-21 11:57 pm (UTC)G: *drool*
M: Those are fake, you know.
G: Who cares?
Sometimes she will draw my attention to a particularly nice view that she thinks I've missed.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:02 am (UTC)Indeed
Date: 2006-11-22 12:08 am (UTC)Re: Indeed
Date: 2006-11-22 12:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:34 am (UTC)As in 'Passing Attempts at Real with Implants' or 'Passing Attempt at Femininity by Someone Once/Still a Man'?
Like I said, it being Vegas.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 01:14 am (UTC)Aren't *all* implants an attempt at passing at real? I mean, I don't think anyone gets them with the intent of them *looking* fake, do they?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 01:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 02:01 am (UTC)So wait - under-inflated looks more fake? Huh. I would have expected them to look better.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 02:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 02:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-22 02:34 pm (UTC)