To all my biohomies...
I am aswim in ncRNA, miRNA, snoRNA, transposons, introns, exons, and transgenic events. I know now the beauty of ultra-conserved sequences (and how they kept robust against intron invasion), and deny the junk-DNA orthodoxy.
I also see precisely how my research fits into all of it.
John Mattick said "We should talk."
Yeah, it was a good afternoon. :)
I also see precisely how my research fits into all of it.
John Mattick said "We should talk."
Yeah, it was a good afternoon. :)
no subject
no subject
Basically, the way that my research in software engineering took programming and distilled it down to the basic elements, and all the way those could interact, and then built it back up again, I see treating the processes inside the nucleus as a nice big rich run-time environment. The coding DNA bits produce output. The non-coding DNA bits produce the infrastructure for the coding DNA to work in. My research teases apart the infrastructure-producing code from a mix of that and output-producing code, and tells the user what the infrastructure is, and what it does to facilitate the output code's work.
Well, if you have a basic knowledge of the pieces of what the non-coding DNA produces, and how those pieces interact with one another, you can start to build a larger picture of what the overall infrastructure of the DNA processes are. I'm not looking at *one* aspect, I'm looking at *all* of them. If new interactions are discovered, toss them into the soup of what the tool can look for, and start generating new results. Every time a new relationship is figured out, new avenues of inference open up.